Algorithmic bias is one of the primary risks associated with emerging physical surveillance technologies. While the risks of facial recognition software are well known and documented, efforts are being taken to adapt computer vision to new and novel use cases. For example, one of the more deeply flawed failures was an attempt to detect aggressive behaviour or body language, which was unfeasible as there was not enough training data available. Other physical security systems will face a similar challenge of not discriminating against individuals based on protected factors due to a lack of training data, or more likely, a lack of gender or racially unbiased training data. Companies considering purchasing advanced or emerging physical security systems should enquire about the training data used in the development of those systems to not be subject to civil penalties resulting from discrimination caused by using said systems.

CISOs now face substantial personal risks, as seen in cases like Uber and SolarWinds where the SEC has taken legal action against the security chiefs. The primary risk is both personal and professional liability for the CISO, according to Kayne McGladrey, field CISO at Hyperproof. The problem, however, is that boards unaware of the business risks from poor cybersecurity are unlikely to include the CISO in the Directors & Officers insurance policy. “This exposes CISOs to substantial risk,” McGladrey told Cybersecurity Dive.

Prepare to laugh until your stomach hurts with our most hilarious episode yet, featuring the one and only theater kid turned cybersecurity guru, Kayne McGladrey, Field CISO at Hyperproof. Join us for a rollercoaster of emotions as we dive into the absurdity of security info in 10K filings, engage in heated debates over the polarizing cinnamon sticky bun ale, and champion the cause for more singing and dancing in cybersecurity. Think of it as the "Cybersecurity's Got Talent" episode you never knew you needed! Kayne's journey is packed with invaluable insights and captivating stories that are as unique as they are engaging.

Despite this guidance mandating only four disclosures (identifying and managing risks, disclosing material breaches, board oversight, and management’s role), over 40% of the 2,100+ 10-K filings I’ve reviewed between January 1 and March 11, 2024 disclosed eleven distinct topics.

Companies are disclosing more information than required in their 10-K filings for various reasons. One is that they lack a broad consensus how much detail to disclose in Section 1C. The recent civil litigation of SEC vs. Tim Brown and SolarWinds (case 1:23-cv-09518 in the Southern District of New York) significantly influences the disclosure requirements.

Tom provides an update on the status of the Hyperproof FedRAMP project. Along the way, Kayne uncovers some of the challenges associated with the project and suggests solutions for others going through the same process. And straight out of left field, Kayne actually likes a beer more than Tom. Come find out what caused this seismic disturbance in the force.

In recent years, we've seen a significant shift in the threats targeting businesses. "Everybody focused on the human harms, people couldn't check into their hotel rooms; people couldn't use an ATM... the nature of the technical exploits is not what we focus on in terms of harm... that's not what we focus on in terms of harm," states Kayne McGladrey, a field CISO at Hyperproof and senior IEEE member. This reiterates the transition from mere inconvenience to significant operational disruptions and economic consequences that cyber threats now pose.

During this Hyperproof live stream series, leaders in information security shed light on crucial topics that shape the modern cybersecurity landscape. This month’s episode features Jeff Warren, Owner & Principal Consultant at South Lake Cyber Risk, LLC, and our host, Kayne McGladrey, Field CISO at Hyperproof. Guided by Kayne and audience questions, Jeff will share insights into his current work and past experiences in the field. Register now for your chance to learn from one of today’s top infosec pros.

Kayne McGladrey, Field CISO at Hyperproof and IEEE Senior Member, noted that the use of generative AI models in business hinges on their ability to provide accurate information. He cited as examples studies of AI models’ abilities to extract information from documents used for financial sector regulation that are frequently relied on to make investment decisions.

“Right now, the best AI models get 80 percent of the questions right,” McGladrey said. “They hallucinate the other 20 percent of the time. That’s not a good sign if you think you are making investment decisions based on artificial intelligence telling you this is a great strategy four out of five times.”

Join Tom Coughlin, J.L. Doty, Gloria Washington, Kathleen Kramer and me as we explore the jobs we’ll see created over the next 20 years, industry’s role driving innovation and the skills our future workforce will need.

“These threats are not merely theoretical, although, at the moment, they are still relatively limited in their application,” McGladrey said. “It is reasonable to expect that threat actors will continue to find innovative new uses of generative AI, extending beyond business email compromise, deepfakes, and the generation of attack code.”

"In 2024, the most significant cybersecurity surprise will be the widespread recognition that Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) are primarily risk advisors, not risk owners. This distinction contrasts with some companies' previous perceptions and the operational reality. With cybersecurity concerns such as data center vulnerability, cloud vulnerability, and ransomware attacks still being a top concern for business leaders in 2024, this distinction is important to keep in mind to ensure the success of corporate security. Business systems are managed by business owners, whose performance is measured based on the system's effectiveness. Historically, some companies have incorrectly assumed that the CISO is responsible for authorizing or mitigating some of the risks associated with these business systems. This is a misconception. The business owner, likely the individual who has approved the business continuity plan or is most affected by operational disruptions, also bears the responsibility of deciding how to address each risk. While CISOs can identify and propose mitigation strategies for business risks related to cybersecurity, they do not and should not accept or authorize the mitigation of risks for systems outside their ownership."

"In 2024, the most significant cybersecurity surprise will be the widespread recognition that Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) are primarily risk advisors, not risk owners. This distinction contrasts with some companies' previous perceptions and the operational reality. With cybersecurity concerns such as data center vulnerability, cloud vulnerability, and ransomware attacks still being a top concern for business leaders in 2024, this distinction is important to keep in mind to ensure the success of corporate security. Business systems are managed by business owners, whose performance is measured based on the system's effectiveness. Historically, some companies have incorrectly assumed that the CISO is responsible for authorizing or mitigating some of the risks associated with these business systems. This is a misconception. The business owner, likely the individual who has approved the business continuity plan or is most affected by operational disruptions, also bears the responsibility of deciding how to address each risk. While CISOs can identify and propose mitigation strategies for business risks related to cybersecurity, they do not and should not accept or authorize the mitigation of risks for systems outside their ownership."

“It should be a strategic choice for a company to transfer certain business risks associated with cybersecurity threats, which exceed an acceptable level of risk, to an insurer,” says Kayne McGladrey, a senior member of the IEEE. “The expectation is that the insurer will help lessen the financial impact of significant cyber incidents or data breaches.”

However, this approach assumes companies maintain risk registers with clear definitions and measurement criteria for various risk categories, he notes. “It also presumes they use compliance operations to continuously assess the effectiveness of their current controls in reducing or mitigating these risks.”

Next, commit to solving the complexity issue. In practice, this involves consolidation and integration of tools while striking “a balance between robust protection and user convenience,” said Kayne McGladrey (@kaynemcgladrey), Field CISO at Hyperproof and Senior IEEE Member. For example, “automation and integration of security controls are crucial in achieving scalability and simplifying validation of efficient control operations.”

Kayne and Tom are joined by special guest Michael Chaoui, the Founder of Atlas One Security. Michael pulls the covers back on some of the challenges of companies going through the ATO process. We also discuss recent legislation and draft memos intended to modernize the FedRAMP process, all while enjoying one of Michael’s favorite stout beers.