The Ultimate Cyber Conversation with the CyberHub Engage Podcast

It’s time we heard from people who live and breathe cybersecurity. Join me as we discuss the highs and lows of working in this industry, the topics that need clarifying, and those that need the B.S. removed. Kayne is active in the community and has offered some GRC maturity models to help anyone.

Kayne McGladrey, field CISO at Hyperproof.io, explained the dangers of such an approach. “Low-cost, high-speed and generally unmonitored networking devices provide threat actors a reliable and robust infrastructure for launching attacks or running command and control infrastructure that will take longer to detect and evict,” he said. McGladrey also pointed out that as organizations deploy 5G as a replacement for Wi-Fi, they may not correctly configure or manage the optional but recommended security controls. “While telecommunications providers will have adequate budget and staffing to ensure the security of their networks, private 5G networks may not and thus become an ideal target for a threat actor,” he said.

Despite this guidance mandating only four disclosures (identifying and managing risks, disclosing material breaches, board oversight, and management’s role), over 40% of the 2,100+ 10-K filings I’ve reviewed between January 1 and March 11, 2024 disclosed eleven distinct topics.

Companies are disclosing more information than required in their 10-K filings for various reasons. One is that they lack a broad consensus how much detail to disclose in Section 1C. The recent civil litigation of SEC vs. Tim Brown and SolarWinds (case 1:23-cv-09518 in the Southern District of New York) significantly influences the disclosure requirements.

The privacy risks associated with agentic AI are orders of magnitude greater than those we encounter today.

“Agentic AI requires comprehensive data integration that’s fundamentally different from today’s siloed approach, meaning the risk multiplies instead of simply adding up,” IEEE Senior Member Kayne McGladrey said.

In this very entertaining episode of The Other Side of the Firewall podcast, we’ll learn Kayne’s amazing cybersecurity “origin story” and discuss the need for more diversity of culture and thought within cybersecurity. We’ll also go into upcoming Federal and State policy and how he and his team have developed the tools necessary to keep up with the future of Governance, Risk, and Compliance. Don’t miss out!

Over the past year and a half, school administrators, teachers, and IT support staff and students themselves have been working in a complex threat environment. The pandemic and major increase in cyberattacks has resulted in closures for both in-person and online schools. While this will only continue into 2022, it will be importance for security and IT professionals that support schools to align their policies, procedures, and technical controls to a cybersecurity framework that fits the needs of their organization, such as the recently announced K-12 resources announced jointly by the FBI and CISA. Using a formal framework can help schools effectively identify and mitigate gaps in school security postures without substantial budget increases. Schools should also consider a quarterly exercise to re-audit their password stores, as the number of compromised passwords will only continue to increase in the year ahead. A password that was secure three months ago may have appeared in a data breach (especially since students and adults tend to use the same passwords for multiple accounts) and may no longer be a secure option. Although it’s hard to predict what’s to come for educational institutions moving forward and future of remote and hybrid learning is going to be uncertain, education professionals should expect to see threat actors continue to target schools that have not taken a proactive approach to cybersecurity and deployed the appropriate defenses.