# Integration Progress Dashboard

- **PURPOSE:** Provides a structured approach to measuring and visualizing progress in security-business integration efforts.
- **WHEN TO USE:**For regular (monthly/quarterly) reporting to stakeholders on integration initiatives, during executive reviews, or when evaluating the effectiveness of integration efforts.

**Security-Business Integration Progress Dashboard**

## INTEGRATION METRICS SUMMARY

| Metric Category | Current Score | Target | Trend | Status |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Process Metrics |  |  |  |  |
| Outcome Metrics |  |  |  |  |
| Perception Metrics |  |  |  |  |
| OVERALL |  |  |  |  |

Table 1: Integration Metrics Summary

## KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

### Process Metrics

*Measuring the mechanics of integration*

| Metric | Baseline | Previous | Current | Target | Trend |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| % of projects with security involved in planning phase |  |  |  |  |  |
| % of business initiatives with documented risk assessments |  |  |  |  |  |
| # of cross-functional risk reviews conducted |  |  |  |  |  |
| % of security policies with documented business impact |  |  |  |  |  |
| Average time to complete risk assessments (days) |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |

Table 2: Process Metrics

Outcome Metrics

*Measuring the business results of integration*

| Metric | Baseline | Previous | Current | Target | Trend |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| # of security incidents impacting business operations |  |  |  |  |  |
| % reduction in time-to-market delays due to security |  |  |  |  |  |
| % of audit findings addressed within target timeframe |  |  |  |  |  |
| $ value of prevented security incidents (estimated) |  |  |  |  |  |
| % of business units meeting security compliance targets |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |

Table 3: Outcome Metrics

### Perception Metrics

*Measuring stakeholder views of integration*

| Metric | Baseline | Previous | Current | Target | Trend |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Business satisfaction with security collaboration (1-10) |  |  |  |  |  |
| Security team satisfaction with business engagement (1-10) |  |  |  |  |  |
| % of business leaders who view security as an enabler |  |  |  |  |  |
| % of employees who understand their security responsibilities |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |

Table 4: Perception Metrics

### INTEGRATION SUCCESS STORIES

| Business Unit | Success Story | Business Value | Key Integration Factors |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |
|  |   |  |  |

Table 5: Integration Success Stories

### CHALLENGES AND IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES

| Challenge | Impact | Mitigation Plan | Owner | Target Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|   |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |

Table 6: Challenges and Improvement Opportunities

## IMPLEMENTATION TIPS:

- Customize metrics to align with your organization's specific integration goals and business priorities
- Include both quantitative data and qualitative insights, such as brief success stories that illustrate integration benefits
- Present trend data to show progress over time rather than focusing only on current status

***

(c)[Kayne McGladrey](https://kaynemcgladrey.com/) - [Get the full book "Cyber Risk is a Myth"](https://www.routledge.com/Cyber-Risk-is-a-Myth-A-Business-Approach-to-Integrated-Risk-Management/McGladrey/p/book/9781041249054)